My office is right on the square in downtown Fairfield where I have been witnessing what I would call a “Beautification Boondoggle“.
“Beautification”, as in the local government is trying to make the town prettier based on the aesthetic definitions of a few. And “Boondoggle”, as in the project for beautifying the town is not being thoroughly thought out or re-evaluated (I assume), but continues on it’s course despite some obvious issues.
First there’s the aesthetic failure, which I admit is purely subjective, but here’s my take. Trees and flowers are good. I LOVE trees and flowers (and bees and chocolate btw). But removing the funky things that give your town character, and replacing them with cookie cutter standards that don’t distinguish your town from say any suburb in Chicago, is not good. I also met an art gallery owner who’s been told he cannot put up a custom made polished metallic sign above his art gallery because it doesn’t “fit the new beautification code”. How ironic that a town that promotes an extensive and successful Art Walk every month, is now limiting the expression of an art gallery. Yet right next door there’s a drug store with an ugly corporate logo awning. Sigh (smacks head).
Next there’s the practical failure. Last year they started this beautification project by paving the cross walk areas with bricks. It looked ok, but it was obvious to everyone I spoke with that they wouldn’t last but a couple Iowa winters. But none of us were brick experts and assumed these brick guys knew what they were doing.
One year later:
Oops! And there are lot’s more completely damaged bricks after only one winter. What a waste of money to jackhammer so much of the road and sidewalks and replace them with a more expensive, less durable material. And for what? So our town can look like Naperville/Bollingbrook/Wheaton/Oakbrook Illinois?
The alleys are being paved and fitted with a much better drainage system, which is great given that I’ve literally had to wade into my office door (which is on the alley). However instead of pouring concrete, they’re pouring concrete and then stamping and staining it to look like old rustic bricks. They already messed up twice and had to tear out newly poured concrete in order to redo the brick stamp. And the brick stamp pattern is completely different from the real brick pattern 10ft away (aesthetic failure).
It’s puzzling. Why not just save the money and do nice smooth concrete? Or, let’s assume for a moment that the fake brick stamping DOESN’T make you feel like you’re at Disney World: why not just apply the stamping model to the crosswalks too? At least it would all match, last longer and save some money.
The whole office has watched this project pretty closely given that it’s right outside our window and has involved many many hours of jack-hammering. A couple of us called the city to make sure that bike racks would be part of the improvements. Our office alone produces as many as eight bikes parked in the alley on a nice day, in addition to the 3-6 bikes from the other office in our building. The city said they were putting in bike racks and we eagerly awaited a “bike rack”. You know one of those 6-10 feet long metal racks where you can fit a dozen bikes if needed.
What we got was this:
Um . . . that’s no good. It’s a bummer that a town that I thought was interested in promoting green culture, spends untold dollars on replacing perfectly good sidewalk with the brickwork you see (in front of the bike rack) yet skimps on bike racks. That bike rack will hold two bikes, which means that the new fancy light posts they put in along the street are now going to be the most common place you see a bike tied up - which I’m sure will annoy the beautification people. Ah, the irony.
I wish someone could have stopped the project after last summer and focused on lighting, alley repairs (drainage and pavement), bike racks, benches and painting in crosswalks. What attracted me to Fairfield were things like the hand painted benches in the square park, the old style merry go rounds in the playgrounds (since removed), the character of the store fronts around town and claims of a government backing green culture. I hope what I am seeing here is not a pattern of some sort of rural gentrification. And I certainly hope that the migration of families like mine to Fairfield isn’t being misread as “beautify it and more people will come”. I didn’t move two thousand miles to trade one suburb for another.
Having said all that . . . I know first hand how projects can take a life of there own. Managing something like this must have been a nightmare. I sympathize with that, and appreciate the new lights and drainage.
Note: I decided to write this only after hearing unsolicited opinions from several other people who work on the square and all have the same view. I’m curious to hear some alternate perceptions of the beautification project.
Comments (0)